|
Chairman's Annual Report for 2006-07
I am glad to welcome you all to this first meet of our
Board for the year 2006/07. Our program Sikshana is making good progress on all
fronts, thanks to the generous support that we have been receiving from all
quarters. I would like to use this opportunity to share with you the salient
features of our achievements during the past year and seek your advice and
guidance for future.
Reach
of Sikshana:
Though we intended the year to be one of consolidation,
I am glad to report that the number of schools under Sikshana increased
substantially from 28 to 46 schools, with about 10,000 children.
This was due to the addition of a cluster of 21 schools in the Kanakapura
Zone, for which we received additional dedicated support. We have now reached a
stage where a New Phase involving a substantial increase in coverage is called
for in order to achieve the Mission
goal. We have accordingly decided in our deliberations during the year that we
will try and seek extension of Sikshana under such a Phase to cover all upper
primary schools in the Kanakapura School District, involving an addition of
about 100 schools; and that this will be our focus during the current and
ensuing years.
Organization:
We have always felt that our Program needs to be run
professionally and that this requires an optimally structured Organization, that
does not unduly burden the resources of the Trust. As a part of this, we have
inducted, during the year, a Program
Director / COO of Sikshana in Mr Prasanna, who comes to us with impressive
credentials and track record. He will be responsible for the implementation of
the program, with the specific task of ensuring compliance by all schools to the
concepts and practices of Sikshana. To assist him, we have placed
in position one Mentor with suitable qualifications for each cluster of
schools. Arrangements have been made
for these Resource Persons to visit their schools
at least once a week.
Volunteers have always been the backbones of our
program. The picture regarding the Volunteer strength in City, though continuing
to be fluid, has shown some improvement; the
group consisting of about 15 young professionals has now organized itself
into an autonomous entity and has
been functioning effectively. If successful, this pioneering effort will be
worth a detailed study and emulation in due course. The volunteer base continues
to be satisfactory in Kanakapura, with most of the 12 members staying with the
program for a third consecutive year.
It is recognized that a new management structure will
however be required to meet the needs of the emerging new Phase, as scaling to
higher levels will pose major challenges. One of the options that we need to
consider seriously at this stage is to get an intern from a reputed Business
school to come and work with us for a few months, with the specific objective of
evolving a suitable Organizational model for the proposed scale of operations.
This study should cover fresh and innovative concepts such as joint adoption and
franchising of Sikshana.
Recognition and support for Sikshana:
We continue to maintain our accreditation with
Credibility Alliance, which gives an assurance to
prospective donors that we adhere to International norms and standards
applicable to Voluntary Sector. We have been receiving consistent support from
other reputed Organizations like Give Foundation and CAF in India, besides Asha
AID and Vibha in USA. At the Corporate level, we received significant assistance
from Adobe, Bosch and GE.
In effect, Vibha is giving total support for covering
all program expenses in the 15 schools comprising the first cluster in
Kanakapura, while the Seattle chapter of Asha is providing similar help for the
other cluster of 21 schools in this zone. AID is covering a major part of the
expenses in the City schools. The support from Bosch has been towards providing
scholarships for 108 children in the KP schools. Adobe and GE are funding our
efforts in multimedia based teaching. While the former has enabled us to take
note book PC's to primary schools, the latter has brought in as many as 100 plus
desktops and note books. As a result, we are in a position to announce with
pride that every one of our schools has now at least one desktop and a note
book; our efforts should now turn towards ensuring effective maintenence of
these units in the field and also to provide appropriate content to be used with
them.
Performance
of Schools under the Program
As you are aware, we have been placing considerable
emphasis on quantifiable targets for our program as a measure of quality
enhancement in learning levels; and on monitoring the performance against them
as a measure of our success. As an indication of our commitment to this concept,
I am bringing to your attention in some detail the results that we had achieved
in our schools during the year under review.
One of the tools used by us in this context is the
series of assessment tests under the APF model. The results obtained in these
tests in the first cluster of 15 Kanakapura schools at the beginning of the
current academic year as well as at the end are given below:
|
School
|
Start
06-07
|
End 06-07
|
|
Kaduhalli
|
58
|
77
|
|
Padavanagere
|
54
|
83
|
|
Jyothi Colony
|
24
|
74
|
|
Hulibele
|
64
|
93
|
|
Aralalu
|
45
|
67
|
|
C’Sandra
|
61
|
82
|
|
Cheelur
|
74
|
82
|
|
Arosh’halli
|
54
|
73
|
|
Uyamballi
|
43
|
91
|
|
Atthihalli
|
59
|
77
|
|
Harohalli
|
36
|
77
|
|
Average
|
52*
|
77*
|
Improvement during the year averaged nearly 50% in this
cluster.
Our target was to ensure that every school registers a
minimum of 65% which signifies an acceptable level of proficiency in the class
room, against a State average of 40%. We have also persuaded the schools to
accept a challenging task of improving the actual score by 15% in a year.
Results above show that the schools have done commendably well against these
goals.
The second cluster of schools in Kanakapura was adopted
late in the year and hence we were able to carry out only one of the two tests;
these figures, reproduced below, still give an idea of their current academic
standards for future reference.
|
Sl
|
School
|
Girls-Kannada
|
Girls - Maths
|
Boys-Kannada
|
Boys-Maths
|
Average
|
|
1
|
Shivanahalli
|
80
|
61
|
82
|
49
|
66
|
|
2
|
Nallahalli
|
76
|
63
|
66
|
59
|
66
|
|
3
|
Kallahalli
|
87
|
73
|
84
|
70
|
78
|
|
4
|
Halagondanahalli
|
68
|
86
|
62
|
80
|
74
|
|
5
|
Thungani
|
92
|
76
|
82
|
60
|
78
|
|
6
|
Dodda Kabballi
|
61
|
42
|
56
|
44
|
51
|
|
7
|
Maralebekuppe
|
66
|
64
|
70
|
70
|
68
|
|
8
|
Krishnaiana Doddi
|
86
|
84
|
70
|
70
|
78
|
|
9
|
Kotekoppa
|
70
|
51
|
66
|
52
|
60
|
|
10
|
Bannimukkodlu
|
78
|
76
|
80
|
84
|
80
|
|
11
|
Alanatha
|
62
|
26
|
48
|
12
|
37
|
|
12
|
Kadushivanahalli
|
88
|
80
|
88
|
88
|
86
|
|
13
|
Hegganur
|
74
|
80
|
84
|
72
|
78
|
|
14
|
Narayanapur
|
72
|
74
|
82
|
68
|
74
|
|
15
|
Kachuvanahalli
|
76
|
74
|
84
|
82
|
79
|
|
16
|
Acchalu
|
84
|
75
|
62
|
52
|
69
|
|
17
|
Hosahalli
|
38
|
72
|
72
|
84
|
66
|
|
18
|
Hukunda
|
68
|
62
|
60
|
56
|
62
|
|
19
|
Arakere
|
68
|
56
|
80
|
60
|
66
|
|
20
|
Mullahalli
|
70
|
52
|
88
|
58
|
65
|
|
21
|
Chikkalegowdana Doddi
|
86
|
78
|
76
|
58
|
75
|
Results from similar tests conducted in the City
schools are given below:
|
School
|
Start 06-07
|
End 06-07
|
|
K Layout
|
84
|
77
|
|
Chandranagar
|
77
|
69
|
|
CKSandra
|
64
|
68
|
|
Gubbalala
|
53
|
64
|
|
S Colony
|
84
|
92
|
|
Arehalli
|
55
|
57
|
|
KHalli
|
76
|
66
|
|
Vasanthapura
|
60
|
58
|
| |